|
The old saying is that "content is king" and while I agree with that... I think that "measurability" is "the new black" when it comes to advertising... online or otherwise. Ok, ok... enough with the "'s and bad metaphors. A new eMarketer and IAB survey/prediction out today says that online ad spending will be down to single digit growth this year. Still better than offline, but not the growth of years past. The article goes on to quote: "Even paid search, which has grown at an outsize pace for years, will see a mere 21.4% rise in spending this year.
Again, the slowing is relative, since paid search spending growth will still outstrip the overall online market through 2009. There’s a reason paid search will stay robust through the economic downturn, according to David Hallerman, senior analyst at eMarketer.
“Especially in economic turmoil, search is more trackable than any other ad format,” said Mr. Hallerman. “At this stage, it is a tried-and-true format that is supporting online growth.” But my question is... Is paid search really all that measurable? Or is it just the best that is out there at the moment? Better than banners - yes, better than ANYTHING (except maybe catalogs) offline - yes. But in an optimal advertising solution - only pay per transaction advertising is truly measurable. Granted I am bias - given what Caliber Data (www.caliberdata.com) does, but the "Holy Grail" of advertising (online especially) since I have been dealing with educating and converting merchants/companies to online (since 1994) has been that ultimately it, (online ads), would lead to the ultimate in concrete results - Money in the till. Paid search gets you part of the way there... but is that a measurable result in the true ROI sense? What makes up "measurabilty" for you?
P
|